User: CWO_19
Name: | Nate Gregg |
Registered on: | 2021-05-20 01:08:41 |
Last Login: | 2024-12-11 11:56:41 |
User Notes:
Owns: 626 Scenarios
Played: 190 (97 unique scenarios: 15%)
Playing Record:
Rating: 952 Show Calculations
View Uploaded Files?
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])
Date | Calculations | New Rating |
---|---|---|
2019-08-24 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.66690790840272 vs John Barkoviak (879.39938167001) | 979 |
2020-01-30 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.4698153199961 vs Chris Gregg (1000) | 996 |
2020-01-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.96590976012] expected: 0.48134921342766 vs cgregg (983) | 1011 |
2020-03-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1011.3690845898] expected: 0.4379090278333 vs cgregg (968) | 993 |
2020-03-01 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.51009127569683 vs Chris Gregg (985.98691110933) | 977 |
2020-03-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 976.6770791777] expected: 0.53637821849608 vs cgregg (1002) | 962 |
2020-03-15 | Rated: 962. expected: 0.42173360720424 vs Chris Gregg (1016.8358970081) | 949 |
2020-03-30 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.3850468633599 vs Chris Gregg (1030.3313724387) | 969 |
2020-03-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 968.67850037248] expected: 0.56060607359511 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
2020-05-01 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49127897191446 vs Chris Gregg (993.06060564496) | 1003 |
2020-05-08 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.5376599479665 vs Chris Gregg (976.78153274622) | 1002 |
2020-05-15 | Rated: 1002. expected: 0.53450306393789 vs Chris Gregg (977.98665108115) | 985 |
2020-05-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.89590195399] expected: 0.51453686796504 vs cgregg (995) | 969 |
2020-06-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 969.36108172887] expected: 0.5596379632914 vs cgregg (1011) | 987 |
2020-06-15 | Rated: 987. expected: 0.49123440242014 vs Chris Gregg (993.09158517468) | 1003 |
2020-07-04 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.53761765834959 vs Chris Gregg (976.81108605212) | 986 |
2020-07-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 985.79623493281] expected: 0.51180397331217 vs cgregg (994) | 970 |
2020-07-15 | Rated: 970. expected: 0.44322488395133 vs Chris Gregg (1009.622272854) | 956 |
2020-07-29 | Rated: 956. expected: 0.57886104725254 vs John Barkoviak (900.7404347389) | 969 |
2020-08-01 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.42177632406533 vs Chris Gregg (1023.8054691405) | 956 |
2020-08-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.50315762991] expected: 0.61517865547117 vs cgregg (1037) | 943 |
2020-08-03 | Rated: 943. expected: 0.57952950717067 vs John Barkoviak (887.26398825098) | 924 |
2020-08-12 | Rated: 924. expected: 0.52615515460166 vs John Barkoviak (905.80893248044) | 907 |
2020-08-29 | Rated: 907. expected: 0.47749895174197 vs John Barkoviak (922.6458974277) | 924 |
2020-10-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 923.72003354426] expected: 0.67286448769731 vs cgregg (1049) | 945 |
2020-10-20 | Rated: 945. expected: 0.38349829695012 vs Chris Gregg (1027.4683363937) | 965 |
2020-11-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 964.7280544976] expected: 0.5619533287981 vs cgregg (1008) | 983 |
2020-11-05 | Rated: 983. expected: 0.4899023881754 vs Chris Gregg (990.01749347846) | 999 |
2020-11-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.32312357839] expected: 0.46362149125906 vs cgregg (974) | 1014 |
2020-11-10 | Rated: 1014. expected: 0.578266379757 vs Chris Gregg (959.16411227971) | 1027 |
2020-11-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1027.4954758478] expected: 0.38482320675845 vs cgregg (946) | 1008 |
2020-11-13 | Rated: 1008. expected: 0.56059592513078 vs Chris Gregg (965.68565738373) | 990 |
2020-11-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 990.06093039582] expected: 0.49127850470259 vs cgregg (984) | 1006 |
2020-11-18 | Rated: 1006. expected: 0.55407246619286 vs Chris Gregg (968.27908784952) | 1020 |
2020-11-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1020.2696810818] expected: 0.40577024202456 vs cgregg (954) | 1033 |
2020-11-26 | Rated: 1033. expected: 0.62936793282616 vs Chris Gregg (941.01535225521) | 1045 |
2020-12-04 | Rated: 1045. expected: 0.6607989646885 vs Chris Gregg (929.15512610565) | 1056 |
2020-12-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1055.85443313] expected: 0.31140608656151 vs cgregg (918) | 1066 |
2020-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1065.8194278999] expected: 0.2873106380194 vs cgregg (908) | 1075 |
2020-12-10 | Rated: 1075. expected: 0.733851809242 vs Chris Gregg (898.80605958338) | 1084 |
2020-12-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1083.5167421043] expected: 0.24713114278775 vs cgregg (890) | 1059 |
2020-12-20 | Rated: 1059. expected: 0.69723353223724 vs Chris Gregg (914.09180343079) | 1037 |
2020-12-27 | Rated: 1037. expected: 0.6408559838029 vs Chris Gregg (936.40327646238) | 1016 |
2020-12-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1016.4926085183] expected: 0.41521034194838 vs cgregg (957) | 998 |
2021-01-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 997.77933946066] expected: 0.46869800101109 vs cgregg (976) | 981 |
2021-01-02 | Rated: 981. expected: 0.48273508378045 vs Chris Gregg (993.00166396765) | 966 |
2021-01-09 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.43921287790324 vs Chris Gregg (1008.4491866486) | 952 |
2021-01-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.9451879071] expected: 0.60085391988581 vs cgregg (1023) | 939 |
2021-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 939.17251334344] expected: 0.63584699051826 vs cgregg (1036) | 960 |
2021-01-26 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.42058708382993 vs Chris Gregg (1015.6528963034) | 979 |
2021-02-10 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.47395877767299 vs Chris Gregg (997.11168298597) | 996 |
2021-02-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.83331911446] expected: 0.47722978305056 vs cgregg (980) | 1011 |
2021-02-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1011.1046721721] expected: 0.43403677743399 vs cgregg (965) | 993 |
2021-02-25 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.51422782746548 vs Chris Gregg (983.11082312211) | 977 |
2021-03-26 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.3106651732685 vs Martin Vicca (1115.4550602522) | 967 |
2021-04-16 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.28663109862225 vs Martin Vicca (1125.3963457968) | 958 |
2021-06-02 | Rated: 958. expected: 0.57438453611468 vs John Barkoviak (905.92586388344) | 940 |
2021-06-16 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.52256989002818 vs John Barkoviak (924.30616903911) | 955 |
2021-08-07 | Rated: 955. expected: 0.56577503209732 vs John Barkoviak (909.02840552001) | 937 |
2021-09-03 | Rated: 937. expected: 0.41092095573232 vs Chris Gregg (999.56611360101) | 956 |
2021-09-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 955.85052941657] expected: 0.53612991587539 vs cgregg (981) | 973 |
2021-09-08 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.47404202449418 vs Alan Lynott (991.05368033539) | 974 |
2021-09-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.83065521619] expected: 0.4858563241837 vs cgregg (964) | 957 |
2021-09-14 | Rated: 957. expected: 0.46630016806078 vs Chris Gregg (980.45259762612) | 942 |
2021-09-18 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.42378695189924 vs Chris Gregg (995.37420300407) | 960 |
2021-09-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.43881753922] expected: 0.52381542285852 vs cgregg (977) | 977 |
2021-09-24 | Rated: 977. expected: 0.52410389319547 vs Chris Gregg (960.23790646853) | 960 |
2021-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 960.22867541775] expected: 0.52411714685527 vs cgregg (977) | 945 |
2021-09-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 945.00042411711] expected: 0.56722824502377 vs cgregg (992) | 931 |
2021-09-29 | Rated: 931. expected: 0.39392009968783 vs Chris Gregg (1005.8486961592) | 918 |
2021-10-06 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.35933294854949 vs Chris Gregg (1018.4541393492) | 907 |
2021-10-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 906.50134564642] expected: 0.67060339847268 vs cgregg (1030) | 896 |
2021-10-13 | Rated: 896. expected: 0.30321324028456 vs Chris Gregg (1040.5406912489) | 918 |
2021-10-26 | Rated: 918. expected: 0.35961211797644 vs Chris Gregg (1018.243514938) | 938 |
2021-10-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 938.49241222475] expected: 0.5848105948677 vs cgregg (998) | 957 |
2021-11-09 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 957.20635126052] expected: 0.5313225109354 vs cgregg (979) | 942 |
2021-11-09 | Rated: 942. expected: 0.42572306190275 vs Chris Gregg (993.99767965007) | 928 |
2021-11-16 | Rated: 928. expected: 0.38738105576574 vs Chris Gregg (1007.620817631) | 916 |
2021-11-16 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 915.6038062155] expected: 0.64587426134161 vs cgregg (1020) | 904 |
2021-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 904.27178257843] expected: 0.67469691555071 vs cgregg (1031) | 926 |
2021-12-26 | Rated: 926. expected: 0.38221792818204 vs Chris Gregg (1009.4096987024) | 946 |
2021-12-29 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.43752424628142 vs Chris Gregg (989.6406724042) | 932 |
2021-12-29 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 931.99922411899] expected: 0.6021591631449 vs cgregg (1004) | 919 |
2022-01-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 919.26831733963] expected: 0.63705132425463 vs cgregg (1017) | 940 |
2022-01-15 | Rated: 940. expected: 0.41923892931353 vs Chris Gregg (996.61435762385) | 959 |
2022-10-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 958.58435426197] expected: 0.52791231074223 vs cgregg (978) | 975 |
2022-10-05 | Rated: 975. expected: 0.51998326317408 vs Chris Gregg (961.10680605625) | 990 |
2022-10-13 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.56334404686917 vs Chris Gregg (945.74627047782) | 1004 |
2022-10-13 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1003.9729905002] expected: 0.39787915458798 vs cgregg (932) | 1017 |
2022-10-22 | Rated: 1017. expected: 0.63705192358192 vs Chris Gregg (919.26786705318) | 1029 |
2022-10-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1028.6143384454] expected: 0.33307454722132 vs cgregg (908) | 1039 |
2022-11-06 | Rated: 1039. expected: 0.69326990750482 vs Chris Gregg (897.34161448892) | 1017 |
2022-11-06 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1016.8153629598] expected: 0.36416916911133 vs cgregg (920) | 996 |
2022-11-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 996.46877637141] expected: 0.41944298543041 vs cgregg (940) | 1010 |
2022-11-14 | Rated: 1010. expected: 0.61779903091341 vs Chris Gregg (926.57782446623) | 1022 |
2022-11-27 | Rated: 1022. expected: 0.65014990977387 vs Chris Gregg (914.34739345546) | 1033 |
2022-11-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1033.1952028872] expected: 0.32093814007129 vs cgregg (903) | 1043 |
2022-12-05 | Rated: 1043. expected: 0.70370919469602 vs Chris Gregg (892.72997951772) | 1020 |
2022-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1020.4813057697] expected: 0.35269836139833 vs cgregg (915) | 1000 |
2022-12-19 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.59147395102619 vs Chris Gregg (935.71365243525) | 997 |
2022-12-26 | Rated: 997. expected: 0.58320456038176 vs Chris Gregg (938.64081886809) | 978 |
2022-12-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.33745406778] expected: 0.46933148295551 vs cgregg (957) | 961 |
2023-01-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 961.35606152236] expected: 0.5181880615014 vs cgregg (974) | 946 |
2023-01-05 | Rated: 946. expected: 0.43783974514122 vs Chris Gregg (989.41798203196) | 932 |
2023-01-07 | Rated: 932. expected: 0.39862980389914 vs Chris Gregg (1003.4288538765) | 951 |
2023-01-07 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.24384627523] expected: 0.54700071890038 vs cgregg (984) | 969 |
2023-01-26 | Rated: 969. expected: 0.50360351638471 vs Chris Gregg (966.49597699519) | 985 |
2023-01-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.88468747569] expected: 0.45139003839903 vs cgregg (951) | 999 |
2023-02-03 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.32916870446] expected: 0.4112511637564 vs cgregg (937) | 980 |
2023-02-03 | Rated: 980. expected: 0.53471315403571 vs Chris Gregg (955.8399627598) | 963 |
2023-02-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 962.88917907086] expected: 0.51454653478804 vs cgregg (973) | 979 |
2023-02-19 | Rated: 979. expected: 0.53228545477646 vs Chris Gregg (956.53451088678) | 994 |
2023-03-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 993.96686544715] expected: 0.42576642905549 vs cgregg (942) | 976 |
2023-03-05 | Rated: 976. expected: 0.52247035411485 vs Chris Gregg (960.37547427022) | 959 |
2023-03-18 | Rated: 959. expected: 0.47398340221922 vs Chris Gregg (977.0945256019) | 976 |
2023-03-18 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.83253112898] expected: 0.4772309147011 vs cgregg (960) | 991 |
2023-03-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 991.10392039942] expected: 0.43403784049231 vs cgregg (945) | 1005 |
2023-03-21 | Rated: 1005. expected: 0.60476047304752 vs Chris Gregg (931.11078910425) | 1018 |
2023-03-25 | Rated: 1018. expected: 0.6394505826767 vs Chris Gregg (918.46312424177) | 998 |
2023-03-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 997.53758135435] expected: 0.41654583201347 vs cgregg (939) | 979 |
2023-04-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.86704797878] expected: 0.61876467676645 vs jrwusmc (1063) | 999 |
2023-06-10 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.49856088829085 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1015 |
2023-06-10 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.49856088829085 vs Tim Boord (1000) | 1015 |
2023-07-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1015.0460515747] expected: 0.30017490547327 vs wwillow (868) | 993 |
2023-07-18 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.59367042690347 vs John Barkoviak (927.13320654712) | 1006 |
2023-07-19 | Rated: 1006. expected: 0.56910653585654 vs Chris Gregg (957.67053337557) | 1020 |
2023-07-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1019.7885908526] expected: 0.39262911030533 vs cgregg (944) | 1032 |
2023-08-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1032.3527223824] expected: 0.35814300465049 vs cgregg (931) | 1012 |
2023-08-05 | Rated: 1012. expected: 0.58614197384119 vs Chris Gregg (951.53942385118) | 993 |
2023-08-17 | Rated: 993. expected: 0.53262730047243 vs Chris Gregg (970.2959670141) | 976 |
2023-08-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 975.95592638488] expected: 0.51588834850456 vs cgregg (987) | 960 |
2023-08-19 | Rated: 960. expected: 0.43915278172887 vs Chris Gregg (1002.4915728479) | 978 |
2023-08-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 977.94711098468] expected: 0.51014852921686 vs cgregg (985) | 994 |
2023-08-22 | Rated: 994. expected: 0.53638084116015 vs Chris Gregg (968.67524706506) | 1009 |
2023-08-22 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1008.8358130829] expected: 0.42173372502302 vs cgregg (954) | 1022 |
2023-09-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1022.3312922836] expected: 0.38504697261513 vs cgregg (941) | 1003 |
2023-09-01 | Rated: 1003. expected: 0.56060607855257 vs Chris Gregg (960.67849687632) | 985 |
2023-09-02 | Rated: 985. expected: 0.50918355968838 vs Chris Gregg (978.61789139) | 1001 |
2023-09-02 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1000.70612609] expected: 0.44594856389238 vs cgregg (963) | 1015 |
2023-09-10 | Rated: 1015. expected: 0.59423069204914 vs Chris Gregg (948.72964595544) | 1028 |
2023-09-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1027.9846178544] expected: 0.37063210730987 vs cgregg (936) | 1040 |
2023-09-24 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 1039.8448452883] expected: 0.33920107222111 vs cgregg (924) | 1019 |
2023-09-24 | Rated: 1019. expected: 0.60471262155352 vs Chris Gregg (945.14556568892) | 1000 |
2023-10-21 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 999.64919611029] expected: 0.44887597031826 vs cgregg (964) | 982 |
2023-10-21 | Rated: 982. expected: 0.50052388260175 vs Chris Gregg (981.63596894982) | 966 |
2023-10-29 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.45457366405993 vs Chris Gregg (997.65273319307) | 967 |
2023-11-19 | Rated: 967. expected: 0.45807778363083 vs Chris Gregg (996.19909044299) | 984 |
2023-11-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.34151092381] expected: 0.49231355344583 vs cgregg (979) | 1000 |
2023-11-30 | Rated: 1000. expected: 0.55269687928618 vs Chris Gregg (963.24596628973) | 982 |
2023-11-30 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 982.31369986284] expected: 0.4981094429342 vs cgregg (981) | 966 |
2024-02-03 | Rated: 966. expected: 0.45122566414026 vs J. Boord (1000) | 952 |
2024-02-17 | Rated: 952. expected: 0.43551389266484 vs Chris Gregg (997.06049782611) | 970 |
2024-02-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 970.06355543473] expected: 0.51285774218461 vs cgregg (979) | 986 |
2024-02-27 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 986.47500318463] expected: 0.63009320770438 vs jrwusmc (1079) | 975 |
2024-03-14 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 974.63798583117] expected: 0.67549716504834 vs jrwusmc (1102) | 996 |
2024-03-28 | Rated: 996. expected: 0.54793526301999 vs Chris Gregg (962.58855225009) | 978 |
2024-03-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 978.46607158336] expected: 0.50220748609825 vs cgregg (980) | 963 |
2024-04-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 962.5367111385] expected: 0.54800918160916 vs cgregg (996) | 980 |
2024-04-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.07300495] expected: 0.49701674146669 vs cgregg (978) | 996 |
2024-04-11 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 995.97754067693] expected: 0.63210007807674 vs jrwusmc (1090) | 984 |
2024-04-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 984.20474317539] expected: 0.46808824228963 vs cgregg (962) | 999 |
2024-04-26 | Rated: 999. expected: 0.57425040090662 vs Chris Gregg (947.02117624673) | 981 |
2024-04-26 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 980.62398717099] expected: 0.47753041936826 vs cgregg (965) | 964 |
2024-04-28 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 963.90496059077] expected: 0.52601733520694 vs cgregg (982) | 949 |
2024-04-28 | Rated: 949. expected: 0.43112219217262 vs Chris Gregg (997.16744527338) | 935 |
2024-06-04 | Rated: 935. expected: 0.39238922777888 vs Chris Gregg (1010.9633554229) | 922 |
2024-06-04 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 922.44354471108] expected: 0.64212654534814 vs cgregg (1024) | 911 |
2024-06-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 910.99159416222] expected: 0.76806062326793 vs jrwusmc (1119) | 904 |
2024-06-20 | Rated: 904. expected: 0.31936353974634 vs Chris Gregg (1035.4519505489) | 926 |
2024-06-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 925.78036672812] expected: 0.62429834917233 vs cgregg (1014) | 946 |
2024-07-17 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 945.75791390163] expected: 0.65483504316551 vs jrwusmc (1057) | 935 |
2024-08-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 934.71263528293] expected: 0.51048582319071 vs wwillow (942) | 951 |
2024-08-15 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.04818162503] expected: 0.67749998257374 vs jrwusmc (1080) | 973 |
2024-08-26 | Rated: 973. expected: 0.46978312566758 vs Chris Gregg (994.02245282649) | 990 |
2024-08-31 | Rated: 990. expected: 0.51861999978702 vs Chris Gregg (977.05551284785) | 973 |
2024-10-01 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 973.40416000682] expected: 0.5296051262995 vs cgregg (994) | 958 |
2024-10-19 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 958.3515240484] expected: 0.57237704047879 vs cgregg (1009) | 945 |
2024-10-31 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 944.66758934372] expected: 0.61631669327103 vs jrwusmc (1027) | 964 |
2024-11-08 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 964.38972352839] expected: 0.58355586666414 vs cgregg (1023) | 951 |
2024-11-12 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 951.06351126165] expected: 0.61985521471421 vs cgregg (1036) | 971 |
2024-11-20 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 970.8988781325] expected: 0.56454359670437 vs cgregg (1016) | 957 |
2024-11-25 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 956.96427322704] expected: 0.60358552781145 vs cgregg (1030) | 944 |
2024-12-05 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 944.27901011701] expected: 0.63035613139937 vs jrwusmc (1037) | 964 |
2024-12-10 | ** Nate Gregg [Rating: 964.45040632179] expected: 0.61115452608974 vs cgregg (1043) | 952 |
Games logged: 96 Played Won Lost
Games won: 93
Attacking Win: 48% (100 attempts)
Defending Win: 47.78% (90 attempts)
Opponent filter:
Publication reviews: |
Publication | Headline | Score | Date |
View Uploaded Files?
To-Play List:
Seek list:
| Publications Wanted:
|
Games Played |
Grey rows indicate games logged by your opponent. |
Worst losing streak: 8 games lost (From 2020-12-10 to 2021-01-09 [30 days])