Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 11
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 8
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
---|
1078 | 1003 | 61% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
1131 | 1063 | 60% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
1019 | 994 | 54% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
1048 | 1131 | 38% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
1003 | 1141 | 31% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
1141 | 1003 | 69% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
1075 | 1075 | 50% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
963 | 1019 | 42% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
1083 | 985 | 64% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
979 | 1097 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
1047 | 995 | 57% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1051.5 vs 1046 has a 50.8% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).